Numerical study of titanium alloy high-velocity solid particle erosion

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV MATERIAL SCIENCE Vol. 25 No. 4 2023 Finally, future work should be reasonably conducted together with finite element analysis on local level to explicitly study particle-particle and particle-surface interactions and consider material properties in details. Such studies will be needed also for the estimation of erosion resistance of different types of coatings. Conclusions The numerical study made it possible to determine that: 1. The described approach allows to obtain a good agreement with the qualitative experimental data expressed in erosion crater profile and quantitatively, compared by integral non-dimensional erosion rate values for the studied conditions. 2. The calculated erosion rate under high-speed normal particles impact weakly depends on the turbulence model choice, including GEKO and its parameters; 3. On the contrary, the calculated wear rate significantly depends on the empirical erosion model choice and its calibrating coefficients. 4. The erosion rate profile and integral erosion rate are highly affected by the particle shape. The growth of drag due to change of the particle shapes leads to erosion rate decrease. For the studied conditions, shape factor values of ≈ 0.25 give the best agreement with the experimental data qualitatively and quantitatively. References 1. Shinde S.M., Kawadekar D.M., Patil P.A., Bhojwani V.K. Analysis of micro and nano particle erosion by analytical, numerical and experimental methods: A review. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, vol. 33 (5), pp. 2319–2329. DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0431-x. 2. Hadziahmetovic H.D., Hodzic N., Kahrimanovic D., Dzaferovic E. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based erosion prediction model in elbows. Tehnicki vjesnik = Technical Gazette, 2014, vol. 21 (2), pp. 275–282. 3. Sun K., Lu L., Jin H. Modeling and numerical analysis of the solid particle erosion in curved ducts. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, vol. 2013, art. 245074. DOI: 10.1155/2013/245074. 4. Finnie I. Erosion of surfaces by solid particles. Wear, 1960, vol. 3 (2), pp. 87–103. DOI: 10.1016/00431648(60)90055-7. 5. Grant G., Ball R., Tabakoff W. An experimental study of the erosion rebound characteristics of high-speed particles impacting a stationary specimen. Report No. 73-36. Cincinnati University Ohio, Department of Aerospace Engineering, 1973. 6. Bitter J.G.A. A study of erosion phenomena: Part I. Wear, 1963, vol. 6 (1), pp. 5–21. DOI: 10.1016/00431648(63)90003-6. 7. Bitter J.G.A. A study of erosion phenomena: Part II. Wear, 1963, vol. 6 (3), pp. 169–190. DOI: 10.1016/00431648(63)90073-5. 8. Strokach E.A., Kozhevnikov G.D., Pozhidaev A.A. Chislennoe modelirovanie protsessa erodirovaniya tverdymi chastitsami v gazovom potoke (obzor) [Numerical simulation of solid particle erosion in a gaseous flow (review)]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Aerokosmicheskaya tekhnika = PNRPU Aerospace Engineering Bulletin, 2021, no. 67, pp. 56–69. DOI: 10.15593.2224-9982.2021.67.06. 9. Tarodiya R., Levy A. Surface erosion due to particle-surface interactions – A review. Powder Technology, 2021, vol. 387, pp. 527–559. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.04.055. 10. Krella A. Resistance of PVD coatings to erosive and wear processes: A review. Coatings, 2020, vol. 10, p. 921. DOI: 10.3390/coatings10100921. 11. Fardan A., Berndt C.C., Ahmed R. Numerical modelling of particle impact and residual stresses in cold sprayed coatings: A review. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2021, vol. 409. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126835. 12. Bonu V., Barshilia H.C. High-temperature solid particle erosion of aerospace components: its mitigation using advanced nanostructured coating technologies. Coatings, 2022, vol. 12, p. 1979. DOI: 10.3390/coatings12121979. 13. Taherkhani B., Anaraki A.P., Kadkhodapour J., Farahani N.K., Tu H. Erosion due to solid particle impact on the turbine blade: experiment and simulation. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2019, vol. 19 (6), pp. 1739–1744. DOI: 10.1007/s11668-019-00775-y.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1