OBRABOTKAMETALLOV Vol. 23 No. 3 2021 MATERIAL SCIENCE EQUIPMENT. INSTRUMENTS 6 2 4 Fig. 4. Grinding wheel for diamond abrasive machining When comparing these models, the constructional difference can be clearly seen. In the considered case, the branches X3 (Fig. 3 and Fig. 5), which describe the fastening part, vary on the model because the fastening of the abrasive part is radically different. This can be seen both in the graphs and in the matrices B1 and B2 that describe these models. It can be demonstrated that each wheel design is unique and that when at least one design element is altered, the wheel model also undergoes a corresponding change. Conclusion The study proposes a novel methodology for simulating modular abrasive tools based on graph modeling theory and matrix analysis. This approach allows for comprehensive analysis and synthesis of Fig. 5. Graph-based model of the wheel for diamond abrasive machining 216 221 222 223 224 225 228 229 2210 2322 3111 321 322 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1