OBRABOTKAMETALLOV MATERIAL SCIENCE Vol. 26 No. 4 2024 Diff erences in the specimens were observed in the number of intermetallic inclusions formed and in the grain size. Thus, the EBAM technology gives more homogeneous structure. As a result, the hardness of the specimens obtained by EBAM technology is higher than the hardness of the specimens obtained by WAAM technology at a similar orientation during printing. The diff erence in hardness between EBAM and WAAM is about 3.5 %. At the same time, the speed of production of specimens using WAAM technology is signifi cantly higher. References 1. Alvarez L.F., Garcia C., Lopez V. Continuous cooling transformations in martensitic stainless steels. ISIJ International, 1994, vol. 34 (6), pp. 516–521. DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.34.516. 2. Li C., White R., Fang X., Weaver M., Guo Y. Microstructure evolution characteristics of Inconel 625 alloy from selective laser melting to heat treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2017, vol. 705, pp. 20–31. 3. Liverani E., Fortunato A. Additive manufacturing of AISI 420 stainless steel: process validation, defect analysis and mechanical characterization in diff erent process and post-process conditions. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, vol. 117 (3–4), pp. 809–821. – DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07639-6. 4. Li S.,Wei Q., Shi Y., Zhu Z., Zhang D. Microstructure characteristics of Inconel 625 superalloy manufactured by selective laser melting. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2015, vol. 31, pp. 946–952. 5. Lass E.A., Stoudt M.R., Williams M.E., Katz M.B., Levine L.E., Phan T.Q., Gnaeupel-Herold T.H., Ng D.S. Formation of the Ni3Nb δ-phase in stress-relieved Inconel 625 produced via laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions: A, 2017, vol. 48, pp. 5547–5558. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-017-4304-6. 6. Marchese G., Colera X.G., Calignano F., Lorusso M., Biamino S., Minetola P., Manfredi D. Characterization and comparison of Inconel 625 processed by selective laser melting and laser metal deposition. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2016, vol. 19, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/adem.201600635. 7. Xu F., Lv Y., Xu B., Liu Y., Shu F., He P. Eff ect of deposition strategy on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Inconel 625 superalloy fabricated by pulsed plasma arc deposition. Materials & Design, 2013, vol. 45, pp. 446–455. 8. GrzesikW. Hybrid additive and subtractive manufacturing processes and systems: a review. Journal of Machine Engineering, 2018, vol. 18 (4), pp. 5–24. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7629. 9. Zverev E., SkeebaV., Martyushev N.V., Skeeba P. Integrated quality ensuring technique of plasma wear resistant coatings. Key Engineering Materials, 2017, vol. 736, pp. 132–137. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientifi c.net/KEM.736.132. 10. Dang J., Zhang H., Ming W. New observations on wear characteristics of solid Al2O3/Si3N4 ceramic tool in high speed milling of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V. Ceramics International, 2020, vol. 46 (5), pp. 5876–5886. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.039. 11. Jurić I., Garašić I., Bušić M., Kožuh Z. Infl uence of shielding gas composition on structure and mechanical properties of wire and arc additive manufactured Inconel 625. JOM, 2018, vol. 71, pp. 703–708. DOI: 10.1007/ s11837-018-3151-2. 12. Ivancivsky V., Skeeba V., Bataev I., Lobanov D.V. The features of steel surface hardening with high energy heating by high frequency currents and shower cooling. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, vol. 156, p. 012025. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/156/1/012025. 13. Keist J.S., Palmer T.A. Development of strength-hardness relationships in additively manufactured titanium alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2017, vol. 693, pp. 214–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.03.102. 14. Balovtsev S.V., Merkulova A.M. Comprehensive assessment of buildings, structures and technical devices reliability of mining enterprises. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten’ = Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin, 2024, no. 3, pp. 170–181. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2024_3_0_170. 15. Montevecchi F., Grossi N., Takagi H., ScippaA., Sasahara H., Campatelli G. Cutting forces analysis in additive manufactured AISI H13 alloy. Procedia CIRP, 2016, vol. 46, pp. 476–479. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.034. 16. Shen M.Y., Tian X.J., Liu N., Tang H.B., Cheng X. Microstructure and fracture behavior of TiC particles reinforced Inconel 625 composites prepared by laser additive manufacturing. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2018, vol. 734, pp. 188–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.10.280. 17. Gong Y., Li P. Analysis of tool wear performance and surface quality in post milling of additive manufactured 316L stainless steel. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, vol. 33, pp. 2387–2395. DOI: 10.1007/ s12206-019-0237-x. 18. Ni Ch., Zhu L., Yang Zh. Comparative investigation of tool wear mechanism and corresponding machined surface characterization in feed-direction ultrasonic vibration assisted milling of Ti–6Al–4V from dynamic view. Wear, 2019, vol. 436, p. 203006. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.203006.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1