OBRABOTKAMETALLOV MATERIAL SCIENCE Vol. 27 No. 1 2025 8. Zhang X., Zhang T., Chen K., Xu H., Feng C., Zhang D. Wear mechanism and debris analysis of PEEK as an alternative to CoCrMo in the femoral component of total knee replacement. Friction, 2023, vol. 11 (10), pp. 1845– 1861. DOI: 10.1007/s40544-022-0700-z. 9. Cassari L., Zamuner A., Messina G.M.L., Marsotto M., Chen H., Gonnella G., Coward T., Battocchio C., Huang J., Iucci G., Marletta G., Di Silvio L., Dettin M. Bioactive PEEK: surface enrichment of vitronectin-derived adhesive peptides. Biomolecules, 2023, vol. 13 (2), p. 246. DOI: 10.3390/biom13020246. 10. Yu D., Lei X., Zhu H. Modification of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) physical features to improve osteointegration. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B, 2022, vol. 23 (3), pp. 189–203. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2100622. 11. Du X., Ronayne S., Lee S.S., Hendry J., Hoxworth D., Bock R., Ferguson S.J. 3D-printed PEEK/silicon nitride scaffolds with a triply periodic minimal surface structure for spinal fusion implants. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 2023, vol. 6 (8), pp. 3319–3329. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00383. 12. Han X., Sharma N., Spintzyk S., Zhou Y., Xu Z., Thieringer F.M., Rupp F. Tailoring the biologic responses of 3D printed PEEK medical implants by plasma functionalization. Dental Materials, 2022, vol. 38 (7), pp. 1083–1098. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.026. 13. Dama Y.B., Jogi B.F., Pawade R.S. Application of nonlinear analysis in evaluating additive manufacturing processes for engineering design features: a study and recommendations. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, 2024, vol. 31 (1s). DOI: 10.52783/cana.v31.559. 14. Kharate N., Anerao P., Kulkarni A., Abdullah M. Explainable AI techniques for comprehensive analysis of the relationship between process parameters and material properties in FDM-based 3D-printed biocomposites. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2024, vol. 8 (4), p. 171. DOI: 10.3390/jmmp8040171. 15. Reddy K.U.K., Verma P.C., Rathi A., Saravanan P. A comprehensive mechanical characterization of as-printed and saliva soaked 3D printed PEEK specimens for low-cost dental implant applications. Materials Today Communications, 2023, vol. 36, p. 106438. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106438. 16. Zhang W., Yuan Z., Meng X., Zhang J., Long T., Yaochao Z., Yang C., Lin R., Yue B., Guo Q. Wang Y. Preclinical evaluation of a mini-arthroplasty implant based on polyetheretherketone and Ti6AI4V for treatment of a focal osteochondral defect in the femoral head of the hip. Biomedical Materials, 2020, vol. 15 (5), p. 055027. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605x/ab998a. 17. Du X., Ronayne S., Lee S.S., Hendry J., Hoxworth D., Bock R., Ferguson S.J. 3D-printed PEEK/silicon nitride scaffolds with a triply periodic minimal surface structure for spinal fusion implants. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 2023, vol. 6 (8), pp. 3319–3329. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00383. 18. Lim K.M., Park T.H., Lee S.J., Park S.J. Design and biomechanical verification of additive manufactured composite spinal cage composed of porous titanium cover and PEEK body. Applied Sciences, 2019, vol. 9 (20), p. 4258. DOI: 10.3390/app9204258. 19. Gosavi A., Kulkarni A., Dama Y., Deshpande A., Jogi B. Comparative analysis of drop impact resistance for different polymer-based materials used for hearing aid casing. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, vol. 49, pp. 2433–2441. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.519. 20. Carpenter R.D., Klosterhoff B.S., Torstrick F.B., Foley K.T., Burkus J.K., Lee C.S., Gall K., Guldberg R.E., Safranski D.L. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: a finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2018, vol. 80, pp. 68–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.017. 21. Virpe K., Deshpande A., Kulkarni A. A review on tribological behavior of polymer composite impregnated with carbon fillers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2020, vol. 2311 (1). DOI: 10.1063/5.0035408. 22. Paturkar A., Mache A., Deshpande A., Kulkarni A. Experimental investigation of dry sliding wear behavior of jute/epoxy and jute/glass/epoxy hybrids using Taguchi approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, vol. 5 (11), pp. 23974–23983. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.190. 23. Satkar A.R., Mache A., Kulkarni A. Numerical investigation on perforation resistance of glass-carbon/epoxy hybrid composite laminate under ballistic impact. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, vol. 59 (1), pp. 734–741. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.464. 24. Chinchanikar S. Modeling of sliding wear characteristics of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) composite reinforced with carbon fiber against SS304. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) = Metal Working and Material Science, 2022, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 40–52. DOI: 10.17212/1994-6309-2022-24.3-40-52. 25. Kanitkar Y.M., Kulkarni A.P., Wangikar K.S. Investigation of flexural properties of glass-Kevlar hybrid composite. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2018, vol. 1 (1), pp. 25–29. DOI: 10.24018/ ejeng.2016.1.1.90.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1