ОБРАБОТКА МЕТАЛЛОВ Том 28 № 3 2026 126 ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ 5. Comparison of optical and stylus methods for measurement of surface texture / T.V. Vorburger, H.G. Rhee, T.B. Renegar, J.F. Song, A. Zheng // International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. – 2007. – Vol. 33 (1–2). – P. 110–118. – DOI: 10.1007/s00170007-0953-8. 6. Thomas T.R. Rough surfaces. – 2nd ed. – London: Imperial College Press, 1999. – 296 p. – ISBN 9781860941009. 7. ГОСТ 19300–86. Средства измерений шероховатости поверхности профильным методом. Профилографы-профилометры контактные. Типы и основные параметры. – М.: Изд-во стандартов, 1986. – 12 p. 8. Mostafa Y. A review on various shadow detection and compensation techniques in remote sensing images // Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. – 2017. – Vol. 43 (6). – P. 545–562. – DOI: 10.1080/07038992.20 17.1384310. 9. Martínez Antón J.C., Alonso J., Gómez Pedrero J.A. Topographic optical profi lometry of steep slope micro-optical transparent surfaces // Optics Express. – 2015. – Vol. 23 (7). – P. 9494–9507. – DOI: 10.1364/ OE.23.009494. 10. Comparison of optical and stylus methods for surface texture characterisation in industrial quality assurance of post-processed laser metal additive Ti-6Al4V / T. Buchenau, T. Mertens, H. Lohner, H. Bruening, M. Amkreutz // Materials. – 2023. – Vol. 16 (13). – P. 4815. – DOI: 10.3390/ma16134815. 11. Łukianowicz Cz., Karpiński T. Optical system for measurement of surface form and roughness // Measurement Science Review. – 2001. – Vol. 1 (1). – P. 151–154. 12. Demircioglu P., Durakbasa M.N., Tan O. A comparison between contact type profi lometer and diff erent D optical techniques: a case study in characterization of machined surface structures // Quality-Access to Success. – 2012. – Vol. 13. – P. 117–122. 13. Comparative analysis of surface roughness measurements obtained with the use of contact stylus profi lometry and coherence scanning interferometry / S. Adamczak, J. Świderski, K. Stępień, T. Dobrowolski, I.P. Chmielik // XXI IMEKOWorld Congress “Measurement in Research and Industry”: proceedings, Prague, Czech Republic, August 30 – September 4, 2015. – Prague: IMEKO, 2015. – P. TC14-316. – URL: https:// www.imeko.info/publications/wc-2015/IMEKO-WC2015-TC14-316.pdf (accessed: 20.08.2026). 14. Pawlus P., Reizer R., Wieczorowski M. Comparison of results of surface texture measurement obtained with stylus methods and optical methods // Metrology and Measurement Systems. – 2018. – Vol. 25 (3). – P. 589–602. – DOI: 10.24425/123894. 15. Analysis of roughness profi le on curved surfaces / M. Drbúl, P. Martikáň, J. Bronček, I. Litvaj, J. Svobodová // MATEC Web of Conferences. – 2018. – Vol. 244. – P. 01024. – DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201824401024. 16. Kumar S., Ramkumar J., Chindam C. Surface roughness analysis: A comprehensive review of measurement techniques, methodologies, and modeling // Journal of Micromanufacturing. – 2025. – Vol. 9 (1). – P. 107–130. – DOI: 10.1177/25165984241305225. 17. Nowicki B. Multiparameter representation of surface roughness // Wear. – 1985. – Vol. 102 (3). – P. 161–176. 18. An optical method for measuring surface roughness of machined carbon fi bre-reinforced plastic composites / N. Duboust, H. Ghadbeigi, C. Pinna, S. AyvarSoberanis, A. Collis, R. Scaife, K. Kerrigan // Journal of Composite Materials. – 2017. – Vol. 51 (3). – P. 289– 302. – DOI: 10.1177/0021998316644849. 19. The optical aspect of errors in measurements of surface asperities using the optical profi lometry method / K. Grochalski, M. Wieczorowski, J. H’Roura, G. Le Goic // Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering. – 2020. –Vol. 6. –P. 12. –DOI: 10.3389/fmech.2020.00012. 20. Whitehouse D.J. Handbook of surface and nanometrology. – 2nd ed. – Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010. – 980 p. – DOI: 10.1201/b10411. 21. Roughness parameters / S. Gadelmawla, M. Koura, T. Maksoud, I. Elewa, H. Soliman // Journal of Materials Processing Technology. – 2002. – Vol. 123 (1). – P. 133–145. – DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2. 22. Selected errors in spatial measurements of surface asperities / K. Grochalski, D. Podbereska, M. Wieczorowski, R. Talar, W. Graboń // Materials. – 2024. – Vol. 17 (12). – P. 2918. – DOI: 10.3390/ma17122918. Конфликт интересов Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов. © 2026 Авторы. Издательство Новосибирского государственного технического университета. Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1