OBRABOTKAMETALLOV Vol. 28 No. 3 2026 128 TECHNOLOGY 4. Petzing J.N., Coupland J.M. Measurement of rough surfaces on large curved components using optical methods. Measurement, 2010, vol. 43 (8), pp. 1064–1071. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2010.03.007. 5. Vorburger T.V., Rhee H.G., Renegar T.B., Song J.F., Zheng A. Comparison of optical and stylus methods for measurement of surface texture. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, vol. 33 (1–2), pp. 110–118. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-0953-8. 6. Thomas T.R. Rough surfaces. 2nd ed. London, Imperial College Press, 1999. 296 p. ISBN 978-1860941009. 7. GOST 19300–86. Sredstva izmerenii sherokhovatosti poverkhnosti profi l’nym metodom. Profi lografyprofi lometry kontaktnye. Tipy i osnovnye parametry [Instruments for measurement of surface roughness by the profi le method. Contact profi lographs and profi lometers. Types and main parameters]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo standartov Publ., 1986. 12 p. 8. Mostafa Y. A review on various shadow detection and compensation techniques in remote sensing images. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, vol. 43 (6), pp. 545–562. DOI: 10.1080/07038992.2017.1384310. 9. Martínez Antón J.C., Alonso J., Gómez Pedrero J.A. Topographic optical profi lometry of steep slope microoptical transparent surfaces. Optics Express, 2015, vol. 23 (7), pp. 9494–9507. DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.009494. 10. Buchenau T., Mertens T., Lohner H., Bruening H., Amkreutz M. Comparison of optical and stylus methods for surface texture characterisation in industrial quality assurance of post-processed laser metal additive Ti-6Al-4V. Materials, 2023, vol. 16 (13), p. 4815. DOI: 10.3390/ma16134815. 11. Łukianowicz Cz., Karpiński T. Optical system for measurement of surface form and roughness. Measurement Science Review, 2001, vol. 1 (1), pp. 151–154. 12. Demircioglu P., Durakbasa M.N., Tan O. A comparison between contact type profi lometer and diff erent D optical techniques: a case study in characterization of machined surface structures. Quality-Access to Success, 2012, vol. 13, pp. 117–122. 13. Adamczak S., Świderski J., Stępień K., Dobrowolski T., Chmielik I.P. Comparative analysis of surface roughness measurements obtained with the use of contact stylus profi lometry and coherence scanning interferometry. XXI IMEKO World Congress “Measurement in Research and Industry”: proceedings, Prague, Czech Republic, August 30 – September 4, 2015, P. TC14-316. Available at: https://www.imeko.info/publications/wc-2015/IMEKOWC-2015-TC14-316.pdf (accessed 20.08.2026). 14. Pawlus P., Reizer R., Wieczorowski M. Comparison of results of surface texture measurement obtained with stylus methods and optical methods. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 2018, vol. 25 (3), pp. 589–602. DOI: 10.24425/123894. 15. Drbúl M., Martikáň P., Bronček J., Litvaj I., Svobodová J. Analysis of roughness profi le on curved surfaces. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, vol. 244, p. 01024. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201824401024. 16. Kumar S., Ramkumar J., Chindam C. Surface roughness analysis: A comprehensive review of measurement techniques, methodologies, and modeling. Journal of Micromanufacturing, 2025, vol. 9 (1), pp. 107–130. DOI: 10.1177/25165984241305225. 17. Nowicki B. Multiparameter representation of surface roughness. Wear, 1985, vol. 102 (3), pp. 161–176. 18. Duboust N., Ghadbeigi H., Pinna C., Ayvar-Soberanis S., Collis A., Scaife R., Kerrigan K. An optical method for measuring surface roughness of machined carbon fi bre-reinforced plastic composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 2017, vol. 51 (3), pp. 289–302. DOI: 10.1177/0021998316644849. 19. Grochalski K., Wieczorowski M., H’Roura J., Le Goic G. The optical aspect of errors in measurements of surface asperities using the optical profi lometry method. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 2020, vol. 6, p. 12. DOI: 10.3389/fmech.2020.00012. 20. Whitehouse D.J. Handbook of surface and nanometrology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2010. 980 p. DOI: 10.1201/b10411. 21. Gadelmawla S., Koura M., Maksoud T., Elewa I., Soliman H. Roughness parameters. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, vol. 123 (1), pp. 133–145. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2. 22. Grochalski K., Podbereska D., Wieczorowski M., Talar R., Graboń W. Selected errors in spatial measurements of surface asperities. Materials, 2024, vol. 17 (12), p. 2918. DOI: 10.3390/ma17122918. Confl icts of Interest The authors declare no confl ict of interest. © 2026 The Authors. Published by Novosibirsk State Technical University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1