ОБРАБОТКА МЕТАЛЛОВ Том 28 № 3 2026 342 МАТЕРИАЛОВЕДЕНИЕ 10. Chen D., Chen Y. Optimization parameters for PLA through additive manufacturing: taking mixed shapes as an example // Applied Sciences. – 2024. – Vol. 14 (21). – P. 10035. – DOI: 10.3390/app142110035. 11. Almansoori K., Pervaiz S. Eff ect of layer height, print speed and cell geometry on mechanical properties of marble PLA based 3D printed parts // Smart Materials in Manufacturing. – 2023. – Vol. 1. – P. 100023. – DOI: 10.1016/j.smmf.2023.100023. 12. Optimization of 3D printing process parameters of polylactic acid fi lament based on the mechanical test / S. Raja, A. Prakash, P. Agrawal, P. Patil, T. Rey, Y. Capangpangan, S. Mulugeta, T. Wotango // International Journal of Chemical Engineering. – 2022. – Vol. 2022. – P. 5830869. – DOI: 10.1155/2022/5830869. 13. Optimization of 3D printing parameters for enhanced tensile properties in continuous carbon fi ber reinforced PLA composites / F. Bilir, K. Turker, T. Saadet, G. Ahmet, C. Kilinc // Materials Research Express. – 2025. – Vol. 12 (4). – P. 045302. – DOI: 10.1088/20531591/adc5cc. 14. Dadashi A. Optimization of 3D printing parameters in polylactic acid bio-metamaterial under cyclic bending loading considering fracture features // Heliyon. – 2024. – Vol. 10 (4). – P. e26357. – DOI: 10.1016/j. heliyon.2024.e26357. 15. Kechagias J., Zaoutsos S. Optimization window of printing parameters for specifi c strength and energy consumption in PEEK additive manufacturing // Materials and Manufacturing Processes. – 2026. – Vol. 41 (2). – P. 229–236. – DOI: 10.1080/10426914. 2026.2613641. 16. Chate G., Deshpande A. Optimisation for geometrical dimension of a product using 3D printer based on fused deposition modelling // International Journal of Additive and Subtractive Materials Manufacturing. – 2017. – Vol. 1 (2). – P. 133–144. – DOI: 10.1504/ IJASMM.2017.088201. 17. К вопросу выбора и оптимизации параметров непрерывной лазерной сварки чугуна / Д.А. Илюшкин, В.Г. Солдатов, О.В. Петраков, И.А. Котлярова // Обработка металлов (технология, оборудование, инструменты). – 2021. – Т. 23, № 3. – С. 20–30. – DOI: 10.17212/1994-6309-2021-23.3-20-30. 18. Agrawal D., Kamble D. Optimization of photochemical machining process parameters for manufacturing microfl uidic channel // Materials and Manufacturing Processes. – 2018. – Vol. 34 (1). – P. 1–7. – DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2018.1512115. 19. Eff ect of process variables on Ultimaker 2+ 3D FDMprinted toughPLAparts /A. Karthikeyan, L. Prabhu, T. Khan, T. Sebaey // Materials and Manufacturing Processes. – 2025. – Vol. 40 (3). – P. 402–414. – DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2024.2425622. 20. Generation of customized bone implants from CT scans using FEA and AM / C. Wolf, D. Juchem, A. Koster, W. Pilloy // Materials. – 2024. – Vol. 17 (17). – P. 4241. – DOI: 10.3390/ma17174241. Конфликт интересов Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов. © 2026 Авторы. Издательство Новосибирского государственного технического университета. Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1