On the issue of limiting the irregular motion of a technological machine within specified limits

Vol. 24 No. 2 2022 3 EDITORIAL COUNCIL EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Anatoliy A. Bataev, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Rector, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation DEPUTIES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: Vladimir V. Ivancivsky, D.Sc. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Machinery Design, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation Vadim Y. Skeeba, Ph.D. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Machinery Design, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation Editor of the English translation: Elena A. Lozhkina, Ph.D. (Engineering), Department of Material Science in Mechanical Engineering, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation The journal is issued since 1999 Publication frequency – 4 numbers a year Data on the journal are published in «Ulrich's Periodical Directory» Journal “Obrabotka Metallov” (“Metal Working and Material Science”) has been Indexed in Clarivate Analytics Services. We sincerely happy to announce that Journal “Obrabotka Metallov” (“Metal Working and Material Science”), ISSN 1994-6309 / E-ISSN 2541-819X is selected for coverage in Clarivate Analytics (formerly Thomson Reuters) products and services started from July 10, 2017. Beginning with No. 1 (74) 2017, this publication will be indexed and abstracted in: Emerging Sources Citation Index. Journal “Obrabotka Metallov” (“Metal Working & Material Science”) has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world's leading aggregator of full text journals, magazines and eBooks. The full text of JOURNAL can be found in the EBSCOhost™ databases. Novosibirsk State Technical University, Prospekt K. Marksa, 20, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russia Tel.: +7 (383) 346-17-75 http://journals.nstu.ru/obrabotka_metallov E-mail: metal_working@mail.ru; metal_working@corp.nstu.ru

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV Vol. 24 No. 2 2022 4 EDITORIAL COUNCIL EDITORIAL COUNCIL CHAIRMAN: Nikolai V. Pustovoy, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, President, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation MEMBERS: The Federative Republic of Brazil: Alberto Moreira Jorge Junior, Dr.-Ing., Full Professor; Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos The Federal Republic of Germany: Moniko Greif, Dr.-Ing., Professor, Hochschule RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Russelsheim Florian Nürnberger, Dr.-Ing., Chief Engineer and Head of the Department “Technology of Materials”, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Garbsen; Thomas Hassel, Dr.-Ing., Head of Underwater Technology Center Hanover, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Garbsen The Spain: Andrey L. Chuvilin, Ph.D. (Physics and Mathematics), Ikerbasque Research Professor, Head of Electron Microscopy Laboratory “CIC nanoGUNE”, San Sebastian The Republic of Belarus: Fyodor I. Panteleenko, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, First Vice-Rector, Corresponding Member of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Belarusian National Technical University, Minsk The Ukraine: Sergiy V. Kovalevskyy, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Vice Rector for Research and Academic Affairs, Donbass State Engineering Academy, Kramatorsk The Russian Federation: Vladimir G. Atapin, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk; Victor P. Balkov, Deputy general director, Research and Development Tooling Institute “VNIIINSTRUMENT”, Moscow; Vladimir A. Bataev, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk; Vladimir G. Burov, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk; Aleksandr N. Gerasenko, Director, Scientifi c and Production company “Mashservispribor”, Novosibirsk; Sergey V. Kirsanov, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk; Aleksandr N. Korotkov, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Kuzbass State Technical University, Kemerovo; Evgeniy A. Kudryashov, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Southwest State University, Kursk; Dmitry V. Lobanov, D.Sc. (Engineering), Associate Professor, I.N. Ulianov Chuvash State University, Cheboksary; Aleksey V. Makarov, D.Sc. (Engineering), Corresponding Member of RAS, Head of division, Head of laboratory (Laboratory of Mechanical Properties) M.N. Miheev Institute of Metal Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences (Ural Branch), Yekaterinburg; Aleksandr G. Ovcharenko, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Biysk Technological Institute, Biysk; Yuriy N. Saraev, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (Siberian Branch), Tomsk; Alexander S. Yanyushkin, D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor, I.N. Ulianov Chuvash State University, Cheboksary

Vol. 24 No. 2 2022 5 CONTENTS OBRABOTKAMETALLOV TECHNOLOGY Timofeev S.P., Grinek A.V., Hurtasenko A.V., Boychuk I.P. Machining technology, digital modelling and shape control device for large parts..................................................................................................................... 6 Shlykov E.S. ,Ablyaz T.R.. Muratov K.R. Theoretical simulation of the process interelectrode space fl ushing during copy-piercing EDM of products made of polymer composite materials................................................ 25 Loginov Yu.N., Shimov G.V., Bushueva N.I. Deformations in the nonstationary stage of aluminum alloy rod extrusion process with a low elongation ratio.............................................................................................. 39 Sundukov S.K. Features of the superposition of ultrasonic vibrations in the welding process........................ 50 EQUIPMENT. INSTRUMENTS Podgornyj Yu.I., Martynova T.G., Skeeba V.Yu. On the issue of limiting the irregular motion of a technological machinewithin specifi ed limits.................................................................................................... 67 MATERIAL SCIENCE Burkov A.A., Kulik M.A., Belya A.V., Krutikova V.O. Electrospark deposition of chromium diboride powder on stainless steel AISI 304..................................................................................................................... 78 Gulyashinov P.A., Mishigdorzhiyn U.L., Ulakhanov N.S. Infl uence of boriding and aluminizing processes on the structure and properties of low-carbon steels........................................................................ 91 EDITORIALMATERIALS Guidelines for Writing a Scientifi c Paper ............................................................................................................ 102 Abstract requirements ......................................................................................................................................... 107 Rules for authors ................................................................................................................................................. 111 FOUNDERS MATERIALS 119 CONTENTS

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV Vol. 23 No. 3 2021 MATERIAL SCIENCE EQUIPMENT. INSTRUMENTS 4 2 2 On the issue of limiting the irregular motion of a technological machine within specifi ed limits Yuriy Podgornyj 1, 2, а, *, Tatyana Martynova 1, b, Vadim Skeeba 1, c 1Novosibirsk State Technical University, 20 Prospekt K. Marksa, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russian Federation 2Novosibirsk Technological Institute (branch) Moscow State University of Design and Technology, 35 Krasny prospect (5 Potaninskayast.), Novosibirsk, 630099, Russian Federation a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-5351, pjui@mail.ru, b https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-5519, martynova@corp.nstu.ru, c https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-2295, skeeba_vadim@mail.ru Obrabotka metallov - Metal Working and Material Science Journal homepage: http://journals.nstu.ru/obrabotka_metallov Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) = Metal Working and Material Science. 2022 vol. 24 no. 2 pp. 67–77 ISSN: 1994-6309 (print) / 2541-819X (online) DOI: 10.17212/1994-6309-2022-24.2-67-77 ART I CLE I NFO Article history: Received: 14 March 2022 Revised: 25 April 2022 Accepted: 15 May 2022 Available online: 15 June 2022 Keywords: Production machine Irregularity ratio Drive moment Moment of resistance Moment of inertia Process load Funding This study was supported by a NSTU grant (project No. TP-PTM-1_22). Acknowledgements Research were conducted at core facility "Structure, mechanical and physical properties of materials" (agreement with the Ministry of Education and Science No. 13.ЦКП.21.0034, 075-152021-698). ABSTRACT Introduction. The problem of regulating speed fl uctuations for any mechanism is essential, because the time interval of this movement is the working time during which the main technological operation is performed. In this case, the question may arise about the regulation of motion speeds both during acceleration, idling of the machine, and during the execution of the main technological operation. The main qualitative indicator of the satisfactory operation of any machine is the motion irregularity ratio, the value of which depends on the ratio of the maximum, minimum and average speeds of the drive shaft. Particularly acute is the problem of determining the motion irregularity ratio of the machine, taking into account the characteristics of the motor. In this case, the machine is considered as a system consisting of a single mass. The elasticity of the elements included in the machine is neglected. An analysis of the scientifi c literature in this area indicates that insuffi cient attention is paid to the study of rotation irregularities and its infl uence on the dynamics of mechanisms, especially when it comes to solving equations taking into account the characteristics of the motor. The purpose of this work is to develop a methodology that allows determining and regulate the non-uniform rotation of the drive shaft, taking into account the characteristics of the motor, the forces of useful resistance and the inertia of the masses of the mechanism. The relevance of the study is due to the lack of a unifi ed methodology that allows adjusting the non-uniform rotation of the drive shaft at the stage of designing mechanisms of this type. Theory and methods. It is proposed to use the Lagrange equation of the second kind to determine the equation of machine motion in differential form. Mathematical simulation is carried out using the Mathcad and KOMPAS-3D application packages. Results and discussion. Amethodology is presented that makes it possible to regulate the non-uniform rotation of the shaft. The CAE of the Mathcad system are used to determine the value of the irregularity ratio and patterns of change in these indicators are identifi ed for total operating values that are in the range of 22-46 Nm. An analysis of the results of the calculations performed indicates that the irregularity ratio of the drive shaft rotation is 0.101. It is possible to change this ratio by changing the reduced moment of inertia by installing an additional fl ywheel or changing the torque of the motor shaft. The obtained results of the research made it possible to develop specifi c recommendations for the modernization of the drive designs for machines for mixing bulk materials and to outline ways for further research in this direction. For citation: Podgornyj Yu.I., Martynova T.G., Skeeba V.Yu. On the issue of limiting the irregular motion of a technological machine within specifi ed limits. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) = Metal Working and Material Science, 2022, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 67–77. DOI: 10.17212/1994-6309-2022-24.2-67-77. (In Russian). ______ * Corresponding author Podgornyj Yuriy I., D.Sc. (Engineering), Professor Novosibirsk State Technical University, 20 Prospekt K. Marksa, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russian Federation Tel: +7 (383) 346-17-79,e-mail: pjui@mail.ru Introduction Motion irregularity is one of the main problems of the dynamics of mechanisms. The determination of its values allows choosing rational relationships between the acting external forces, the inertial components of the mechanism and its velocities. The irregular motion of the drive shaft of the machine (main shaft)

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV MATERIAL SCIENCE Том 23 № 3 2021 EQUIPMEN . INSTRUM TS Vol. 4 No. 2 2022 occurs when the moment created by the motor is not constant or the moment of useful resistance is variable [1–11]. Increasing interest in the practice of designing machines for mixing bulk materials is given to drives with irregular motion of the working body. This is due to the fact that in this case the shortening of the entire kinematic chain of the drive is ensured, and at the same time, the quality of the agitated product is improved due to the elimination of dead zones during mixing of the specifi ed type of product [4–7, 9, 10, 12–20]. The problem of regulating speed fl uctuations for any mechanism is essential, because the time interval of this movement is the working time during which the main technological operation is performed – mixing the bulk product [21–23]. In this case, the question may arise about the regulation of motion speeds both during the idling of the machine and during the execution of the main technological operation. The structure of the device may include various types of mechanisms, including lever type, cam, gear, as well as cam-gearlever, mechanisms with elliptical wheels, differential, etc. In this paper, the authors propose the design of a device with a planetary gear in its drive. The use of such a drive will increase the performance of the equipment, its technical and economic effi ciency, which in turn will improve the competitiveness of newly designed machines. When synthesizing mechanisms of this type at the design stage of drives, it is necessary to know the amplitudes of oscillations of the speeds of the drive shaft both during the acceleration of this machine and during steady motion [24–27]. The identifi cation of patterns of change in the speeds of the drive shaft will allow determining the motion irregularity ratio and actively introducing in the design process of the machine, regulating it with the help of rational placement of the inertial-mass components of the designed product and correctly setting the magnitude and pattern of changes in the technological load. An analysis of the scientifi c literature in this area indicates that insuffi cient attention is paid to the study of rotation irregularities and its infl uence on the dynamics of mechanisms, especially when it comes to solving equations taking into account the characteristics of the motor. [1–10, 12, 14, 15, 17–22, 24–27]. The control of the drive devices of machines for mixing bulk materials between the energy infl ow and its consumption to overcome external resistances can have different goals, including maintaining a certain performance [24–27]. Graph analytical methods are usually used to determine the moments of inertia of the fl ywheel masses (fl ywheels) for a given maximum of the machine irregular motion since analytical expression of the motor mechanical properties is problematic [6–10, 14–17]. Usually, driving moments are set as an arbitrary function of the rotation angle or assumed constant. In this case, it is not possible to take into account feedback, i.e., the infl uence of the magnitude of the external resistance on the motion speed of the driver and, as a consequence, on the magnitude of the irregular motion of the drive shaft [16–22, 23–27]. The reduced moments of inertia of the machine may be constant or dependent on the position of the driver. For a wide variety of machine mechanisms, the main power and kinematic characteristics depend on the functions of the driver position [1–11], including in the case under consideration. Most problems in the kinematic analysis of mechanisms assume that the driver moves at a constant speed. However, such an assumption can only be attributed to mechanisms that have a constant moment of inertia (a reduced one). The situation is more complicated with the reduced inertial forces. |It can practically be constant only for bodies having the coordinates of centers on the axis of rotation [5–14, 17–20]. The purpose of this work is to develop a methodology that allows determining and regulate the nonuniform rotation of the drive shaft, taking into account the characteristics of the motor, the forces of useful resistance and the inertia of the masses of the mechanism. The relevance of the study is due to the lack of a unifi ed methodology that allows adjusting the non-uniform rotation of the drive shaft at the stage of designing mechanisms of this type. Theory and methodology It is supposed to consider the above model of the mechanism on the example of a food machine designed for mixing bulk material, in which the moments of resistance, inertia forces and the moments of

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV Vol. 23 No. 3 2021 MATERIAL SCIENCE EQUIPMENT. INSTRUMENTS 4 2 2 inertia of the masses depend on the angle of rotation of the driver (drive shaft), and the drive has an asynchronous electric motor (see diagram shown in Fig. 1). The development of the mathematical model was carried out by means of the Mathcad software product with the direct use of the computer-aided design system Compass 3D. Fig. 1. Kinematic diagram and mathematical model of the kneader design that includes an epicyclic gearing The nature of the change in the process load acting on the working shafts of the device was presented earlier in [25]. This paper presents only the values and nature of the reduced moments of these forces to the main shaft of the device. In our case, it is presented, consisting of two components: ( ) 24 12 cos(2 / 16 ) c M     ; and the moment of the driving forces is represented by a parabola 2 d d M A B dt          , where 2 2 0 m m M A      ; 2 0 2 2 0 m m M B       . The maximum values of the total moment of the useful resistance and the moment of inertia amounted to 46 N·m, the minimum amounted to 22 N·m and depend on the rotation angle of the kneading shafts blades. The device operating peculiarities are described in detail in [24–27]. This paper presents a mathematical model of the device, with the following values introduced: the rotor moment of inertia is designed as JEM; the drive pulley moment of inertia is designed as J1; the driven pulley moment of inertia is designed as J2; gears moments of inertia are designed as J3, J4, J5, J6, J8, J9, J10, J11; that of carrier is J7. The shafts that translate motion from the motor to the working shafts are designated as a, b, c, d, e, f. It is proposed to determine the equation of machine motion using the Lagrange equation of the second kind, which in this instance will have the following form: 2 2 2 1 2 d c d d dJ J M M dt dt d             , (1) where J is the reduced moment of inertia; φ is the generalized coordinates of the system; Мd is driving moment; Mc is the moment of resistance. The drive moment is determined by 2 m d m m M M       , (2) where J is the reduced moment of inertia; σ is the slip corresponding to the value of Мd; σm is the slip corresponding to the value of Мm; Мm is the maximum (overturning moment).

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV MATERIAL SCIENCE Том 23 № 3 2021 EQUIPMEN . INSTRUM TS Vol. 4 No. 2 2022 In equation (1), we replace the Мd value with an expression describing a parabola, then we obtain: 2 d d M A B dt          , (3) where 2 2 0 m m M A      ; 2 0 2 2 0 m m M B        , (4) where ω0 and ωm are the angular velocities of the reduced mass of the system corresponding to Мd = 0 и Мd = Mm. Then equation (1) can be rewritten as: 2 2 1 2 c d dJ J A B M dt d         , (5) where d dt   . Dividing all the terms of this equation by d dt    and transforming equation (5), equation becomes: 1 2 0 c dJ A d M B d d J J                 , (6) Replacing ω2 = u, equation becomes: 2 ( ) 2 ( ) du uf q d       , (7) where 1 2 ( ) dJ A d f J     ; ( ) c M B q J    . Under the initial conditions when t = 0 and u = ω0 2, the solution has the following form: 0 0 2 ( ) 2 ( ) 2 0 0 2 ( ) f d f d e q e d                        , (8) To determine the moment of the fl ywheel inertia, the following assumption will be taken: 0 const, m J J J    where Jm is the reduced fl ywheel moment of inertia; J0 is the reduced kneading machine moment of inertia. The moment of resistance is considered in the form of: 1 2 sin , c M M M n    where M1 is the constant part of the reduced moment of useful resistances; M2 is the maximum value of the variable part of the moment; n is the multiplicity of loading within one revolution. Since J = const, ( ) ; A f J    1 2 sin ( ) . M M n B q J     

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV Vol. 23 No. 3 2021 MATERIAL SCIENCE EQUIPMENT. INSTRUMENTS 4 2 2 The angular velocity is determined as: 0 0 2 2 1 2 2 0 0 sin 2 , A A d d J J M M n B e e d J                         (9) Integrating expressions under the root sign, we get: 0 0 2 2 1 2 2 0 0 sin 2 , A A d d J J M M n B e e d J                         (10) where   1 2 2 0 m m M D J     ;     2 2 2 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 m m m M M D J          ; 2 3 M D J  . Assuming that steady motion occurs at φ tending to infi nity, the expression (10) takes the form   3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 cos 2 sin , 4 D n n D n D D D n        (11) from which 2 3 max 2 2 1 1 2 4 D D D D n     ; 2 3 min 2 2 1 1 2 , 4 D D D D n     (12) The resulting equations (12) are substituted into the equation for determining the irregular motion of the drive shaft, which is the following: max min max min 2 .         (13) Results and discussion The intended purpose requires defi ning the main properties of the motor, which for the case under consideration are: Мd is the drive moment, which is determined in accordance with equation (2); Мm is the maximum (overturning moment).; rates of angular motion: ω0 = 145 s –1 and ω m = 36 s –1 corresponding to Md = 0 and Md = Мm = 158 Nm. All these parameters are presented in the form of a graph in Figure 2, where the solid line shows the properties of the motor, and the dashed line is the parabola described by equation (3), in which A and B are determined by the condition of the parabola passage through the origin and point 0. The moment of the useful resistance, reduced to the main (modifi ed) shaft is presented in the form of a graph shown in Figure 3. In accordance with the previously obtained data presented in [24–27], the reduced moment of inertia of all machine masses to the main (modifi ed) shaft is J = 0,323 kg·m2. The drive shaft speed of rotation was calculated using equation (11). The calculation results are shown in Figure 4. For the case under consideration, the irregular rotation of the modifi ed shaft was 0.085 (11) with a maximum rotation speed equal to ωmax = 145·s –1 and a minimum speed equal to ω min = 133.2 s –1. The analysis of the equation (13) leads to the conclusion that the irregularity ratio depends on the maximum and minimum rotational speeds; the value of the reduced moment of inertia, among other things, depends on the moments of resistance and the driving moment. In this regard, we conducted research in terms of changing the non-uniform of rotation from the value of the reduced moment of inertia and the value of the driving moment. For the former, the change in the value of the motion irregularity is shown in Figure 5, and for the latter in Figure 6.

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV MATERIAL SCIENCE Том 23 № 3 2021 EQUIPMEN . INSTRUM TS Vol. 4 No. 2 2022 Fig. 2. Graph of an asynchronous motor and its special points Fig. 3. The moment of resistance, reduced to the main (modifi ed) shaft Fig. 4. Speed depending on the revolutions of the drive shaft Fig. 5. A graph of the change in the value of the rotation irregularity depending on the mass moment of inertia Fig. 6. A graph of the change in the value of the rotation irregularity depending on the value of the torque

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV Vol. 23 No. 3 2021 MATERIAL SCIENCE EQUIPMENT. INSTRUMENTS 4 2 2 Conclusion A methodology for determining the rotation irregularity ratio of the modifi ed shaft of food machinery, which has an epicyclic gearing with a rocker arm in the drive of kneading shafts is presented, including: – the mathematical model of the mechanism that allows calculating the speed of the modifi ed shaft. Thus, for the case under consideration, the irregular rotation of the modifi ed shaft was (11) 0.085 with a maximum rotation speed equal to ωmax = 145·s –1 and a minimum speed equal to ω min = 133.2 s –1, while the rotation irregularity ratio of the modifi ed shaft was δ = 0,101; – the prospect of improving the dynamic characteristics of the machine by decreasing the irregularity ratio due to an additional fl ywheel mass placed on the modifi ed shaft. Thus, introducing an additional moment of mass inertia up to 0.177 kg·m2 brings its value to 0.06, which meets the requirements for this type of machine; – the nature and value of the change in the technological and inertial loads acting on the working shafts of the device are determined; the values and nature are presented, taking into account its reduction to the main (modifi ed) shaft of the machine; – the maximum values of the total moment of the useful resistance were 44–47 N·m, the minimum were 22–24 N·m; it depends on the rotation angle of the kneading shaft blades; – the pattern of changes in moments from the inertia and technological resistance is determined, which can be expressed by the following general dependence: ( ) 24 12 cos(2 / 16 ). c M     References 1. Hsieh J.-F. Design and analysis of indexing cam mechanism with parallel axes. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2014, vol. 81, pp. 155–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.07.004. 2. Eckhardt H.D. Kinematic design of machines and mechanisms. 1st еd. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1998. 620 p. ISBN: 0070189536. ISBN: 978-0070189539. 3. Myszka D.H. Machines and mechanisms: applied kinematic analysis. 4th ed. Pearson, 2012. 576 p. ISBN: 0-13-215780-2. ISBN: 978-0-13-215780-3. 4. Rao J.S., Dukkipati R.V. Mechanism and machine theory. 2nd ed. New Delhi, New Age International, 2008. 600 p. ISBN: 812240426X. ISBN: 978-8122404265. 5. ZhuB., ZhangX., ZhangH., Liang J., ZangH., Li H.,WangR. Design of compliant mechanisms using continuum topology optimization: a review. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2012, vol. 143, p. 103622. DOI: 10.1016/j. mechmachtheory.2019.103622. 6. Youssef H.A., El-Hofy H. Machining technology: machine tools and operations. Hoboken, Taylor & Francis Group, 2008. 672 p. ISBN 9781420043396. 7. Shabana A.A. Dynamic of multibody systems. 4th ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013. 393 p. ISBN: 978-1107042650. ISBN: 1107042658. 8. ErdmanA.G., Sandor G.N. Mechanism design: analysis and synthesis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson, 2001. 688 p. ISBN: 0130408727. ISBN: 978-0130408723. 9. Kolovsky M.Z., Evgrafov A.N., Semenov Yu.A., Slousch A.V. Advanced theory of mechanisms and machines. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2000. 396 p. Foundations of Engineering Mechanics. ISBN: 978-3-64253672-4. eISBN: 978-3-540-46516-4. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-46516-4. 10. Astashev V.K., Babitsky V.I., Kolovsky M.Z. Dynamics and control of machines. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2000. 235 p. ISBN: 978-3-642-53698-4. eISBN: 978-3-540-69634-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-54069634-6. 11. Hendrickson C.T., Janson B.N. A common network fl ow formulation for several civil engineering problems. Civil Engineering Systems, 1984, vol. 1, iss. 4, pp. 195–203. DOI: 10.1080/02630258408970343. 12. Battarra M., Mucchi E. Analytical determination of the vane radial loads in balanced vane pumps. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2020, vol. 154, p. 104037. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104037. 13. Neugebauera R., Denkena B., Wegener K. Mechatronic systems for machine tools. CIRP Annals, 2007, vol. 56, iss. 2, pp. 657–686. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.007.

OBRABOTKAMETALLOV MATERIAL SCIENCE Том 23 № 3 2021 EQUIPMEN . INSTRUM TS Vol. 4 No. 2 2022 14. Zhoua C., Hua B., Chenb S., Mac L. Design and analysis of high-speed cam mechanism using Fourier series. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2016, vol. 104, pp. 118–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.05.009. 15. Stocki R., Szolc T., Tauzowski P., Knabel J. Robust design optimization of the vibrating rotor-shaft system subjected to selected dynamic constraints. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2012, vol. 29, pp. 34–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.023. 16. Zhang T., Li X., Wang Y., Sun L. A semi-analytical load distribution model for cycloid drives with tooth profi le and longitudinal modifi cations. Applied Sciences, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 14, p. 4859. DOI: 10.3390/app10144859. 17. Xu L.X., Chen B.K., Li C.Y. Dynamic modelling and contact analysis of bearing-cycloid-pinwheel transmission mechanisms used in joint rotate vector reducers. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, vol. 137, pp. 432–458. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.03.035. 18. Kodnyanko V., Shatokhin S., Kurzakov A., Pikalov Y. Theoretical analysis of compliance and dynamics quality of a lightly loaded aerostatic journal bearing with elastic orifi ces. Precision Engineering, 2021, vol. 68, pp. 72–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.11.012. 19. Mott R.L. Machine elements in mechanical design. 5th ed. Pearson, 2013. 816 p. ISBN: ‎0135077931. ISBN: ‎978-0135077931. 20. Novotný P., Jonák M., Vacula J. Evolutionary optimisation of the thrust bearing considering multiple operating conditions in turbomachinery. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2021, vol. 195, p. 106240. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106240. 21. Kaipio T., Smelov L., Morgan C., Leighton N. A practical approach to motion control for varying inertia systems. Progress in system and robot analysis and control design. Ed. by S.G. Tzafestas, G. Schmidt. London, Springer, 1999, pp. 195–204. DOI: 10.1007/BFb0110545. 22. Vulfson I. Dynamics of cyclic machines. Cham, Springer International, 2015. 390 p. ISBN 978-3-319-126333. eISBN 978-3-319-12634-0. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12634-0. 23. Zawislak S., Rysinski J. Graph-based modelling in engineering. Switzerland, Springer International, 2017. 247 p. ISBN 978-3-319-39018-5. eISBN 978-3-319-39020-8. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39020-8. 24. Martynova T.G., Skeeba V.Yu., Podgornyj Yu.I., Lobanov D.V. Synthesis of irregular motion mechanisms for production machine drives. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, vol. 843, p. 012006. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/843/1/012006. 25. Podgornyi Yu.I., Martynova T.G., Skeeba V.Yu., Kosilov A.S., Chernysheva A.A., Skeeba P.Yu. Experimental determination of useful resistance value during pasta dough kneading. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, vol. 87, iss. 8, p. 082039. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/87/8/082039. 26. Podgornyj Yu.I., Martynova T.G., Skeeba V.Yu., Lobanov D.V., Zhirova A.A., Bredikhina A.N., KosilovA.S., Pechorkina N.S. Metodika uravnoveshivaniya rotorov tekhnologicheskikh mashin [The methods of technological machines’ rotors balance]. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) = Metal Working and Material Science, 2016, no. 2 (71), pp. 41–50. DOI: 10.17212/1994-6309-2016-2-41-50. 27. Podgornyj Yu.I., Martynova T.G., Skeeba V.Yu., Lobanov D.V., Martyushev N.V. Algorithm for determining the unbalances of continuous mixers rotors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1061, p. 012071. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2061/1/012071. Confl icts of Interest The authors declare no confl ict of interest.  2022 The Authors. Published by Novosibirsk State Technical University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTk0ODM1