OBRABOTKA METALLOV

Introduction. The world is at the stage of creating an interdisciplinary approach that will be implemented in metallurgical research. The paper formulates the technique of image analysis in the study of processing at different depths from the mold-metal interface. The purpose of the work. Processing of a cast-iron workpiece within the first 3.5 mm of thickness from the mold-metal interface is a serious problem of solid processing. The study of machinability at different depths is a key requirement of the industry for ease of processing. Machinability will determine a number of factors, including tool consumption, workpiece surface quality, energy consumption, etc. The method of investigation. Image analysis is performed to determine the percentage of graphite in etched and non-etched samples. K-means clustering allows to create a new image from a given one with a clear separation of white and black areas by converting a digital image into a binary image using a threshold value for segmentation. The volume fraction of perlite, the volume fraction of graphite and the average size of graphite flakes in microns are used as input variables for the machinability of cast iron. Results and discussion. The output, that is, the segmented image, will be the input function for calculating the workability index using formulas. Thus, microstructural analysis will help predict the workability index of grey cast iron ASTM A48 Class 20. Using this method and the program, based on the microstructure, it is possible to predict in advance the characteristics of the machining of the part, taking into account possible changes in the casting process itself.

1. Wejrzanowski T., Spychalski W., Rózniatowski K., Kurzydlowski K. Image based analysis of complex microstructures of engineering materials. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 2008, vol. 18 (1), pp. 33–39.

2. Samuels L.E. Light microscopy of carbon steels. Materials Park, Ohio, ASM International, 1999.

3. Schwartz A.J., Kumar M., Adams B.L., Field D.P. Electron backscatter diffraction in materials science. 2nd ed. New York, Springer US Publ., 2009. 403 p. ISBN 978-0-387-88135-5. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-88136-2.

4. Krauss G. Steels: processing, structure, and performance. Materials Park, Ohio, ASM International, 2015.

5. Ghosh S., Das N., Das I., Maulik U. Understanding deep learning techniques for image segmentation. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2019, vol. 52 (4), pp. 1–35.

6. Tu Z., Bai X. Auto-context and its application to high-level vision tasks and 3d brain image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2009, vol. 32 (10), pp. 1744–1757.

7. Kang B.-H. A review on image and video processing. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 2007, vol. 2 (2), pp. 49–64.

8. Collins T.J. Image for microscopy. Biotechniques, 2007, vol. 43 (S1), pp. S25–S30.

9. Kaur D., Kaur Y. Various image segmentation techniques: a review. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 2014, vol. 3 (5), pp. 809–814.

10. Dhanachandra N., Chanu Y.J. Image segmentation method using k-means clustering algorithm for color image. Advanced Research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2015, vol. 2 (11), pp. 68–72.

11. Yedla M., Pathakota S.R., Srinivasa T.M. Enhancing K-means clustering algorithm with improved initial center. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 2010, vol. 1 (2), pp. 121–125.

12. Dhanachandra N., Manglem K., Chanu Y.J. Image segmentation using K-means clustering algorithm and subtractive clustering algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, vol. 54, pp. 764–771.

13. Nawaz A., Zhiqiu H., Senzhang W., Hussain Y., Naseer A., Izhar M., Khan Z. Mode Inference using enhanced Segmentation and Pre-processing on raw Global Positioning System data. Measurement and Control, 2020, vol. 53 (7–8), pp. 1144–1158.

14. Singh H., Mao Y., Sreeranganathan A., Gokhale A.M. Application of digital image processing for implementation of complex realistic particle shapes/morphologies in computer simulated heterogeneous microstructures. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2006, vol. 14 (3), pp. 351–363.

15. Lee S.G., Mao Y., Gokhale A.M., Harris J., Horstemeyer M.F. Application of digital image processing for automatic detection and characterization of cracked constituent particles/inclusions in wrought aluminum alloys. Materials Characterization, 2009, vol. 60 (9), pp. 964–970.

16. Kakani S.L. Material science. New Delhi, New Age International, 2006. 656 p.

17. Narkhede H.P. Review of image segmentation techniques. International Journal of Science and Modern Engineering, 2013, vol. 1 (8), pp. 54–61.

18. Celebi M.E., Kingravi H.A., Vela P.A. A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm. Expert systems with applications, 2013, vol. 40 (1), pp. 200–210.

19. Kodinariya T.M., Makwana P.R. Review on determining number of Cluster in K-Means Clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 2013, vol. 1 (6), pp. 90–95.

20. Likas A., Vlassis N., Verbeek J.J. The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recognition, 2003, vol. 36 (2), pp. 451–461.

21. Vermunt J.K. K-means may perform as well as mixture model clustering but may also be much worse: Comment on Steinley and Brusco. Psychological Methods, 2011, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 82–88.

22. Sheladiya M.V., Acharya S.G., Acharya G.D. Technological investigation of effect of machining parameter on tool life. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) = Metal Working and Material Science, 2020, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 41–53. DOI: 10.17212/1994-6309-2020-22.4-41-53. (In Russian).

23. Moore W., Lord J.O. Gray cast iron machinability: quantitative measurements of graphite and pearlite effects. Modern Castings, 1959, vol. 35 (4), pp. 55–60.