Obrabotka metallov

OBRABOTKA METALLOV

METAL WORKING AND MATERIAL SCIENCE
Print ISSN: 1994-6309    Online ISSN: 2541-819X
English | Русский

Recent issue
Vol. 27, No 3 July – September 2025

Formation of the system of the local indicators to assess the quality of the cutting tool at the stage of technical training of production

Issue No 4 (69) October - December 2015
Authors:

Lukina S.V.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17212/1994-6309-2015-4-43-50
Abstract
The technique of a comparative assessment of quality of designs of the cutting tools on a stage of technical training of production. Ten groups of the generalized indicators allowing making a complex comparative assessment of quality of a design of the tool had allocated. Each group of the generalized indicators of quality had presented by set of local criteria. Local criteria had expressed through the variation geometric, design, structural and operational parameters of the cutting tools. The system of the target functions allowing determining parameters of optimum constructions of cutting tools depending on the selected criteria an assessment had created. For a complex comparative assessment of quality of cutting tools the generalized target function in the form of an additive convolution of private criteria had created. As an example, local target functions for comparison purposes of constructions of built-up tooling and broaches had created. The technique is evident, universal and automated with use of the personal computer.
Keywords: quality, systems the local indicators, target function, cutting tool, technical training of production.

References
1. Grigor'ev S.N., Maslov A.R., Zavgorodnii V.I. Obespechenie zadannogo kachestva detalei pri vysokoskorostnoi obrabotke [Guarantee of the assigned quality of the components with the high-speed working]. Vestnik MGTU «Stankin» – Vestnik MSTU «Stankin», 2010, no. 1, pp. 38–40.

2. Grishina T.G. Filosofskii analiz riskov kak kriteriev otsenki tekhnicheskoi sistemy [Philosophical analysis of risks as criteria of the assessment technical system]. Vestnik MGTU «Stankin» – Vestnik MSTU «Stankin», 2014, no. 1 (28), pp. 164–166.

3. Gulyaev Yu.B., Lukina S.V. Avtomatizirovannaya sistema proektirovaniya i vybora sbornykh tortsevykh frez po chastnym kriteriyam otsenki napryazhenno-deformirovannogo sostoyaniya instrumenta [Automated system design and selection of interlocking surface cutters on partial criteria of assessment stress-strain state of the instrument]. Moscow, 2006. 180 p. Available from in VINITI, no. 793-В2006.

4. ISO 9000–1:1994. Quality management and quality assurance standards. Pt. 1: Guidelines for selection and use. Moscow, VNIIS Publ., 1995. 50 p. (In Russian)

5. Kosov M.G. Sovremennye podkhody k osmysleniyu ponyatiya «tekhnicheskoe» [Modern philosophical approaches to understanding the concept of «technical»]. Vestnik MGTU «Stankin» – Vestnik MSTU «Stankin», 2014, no. 1 (28), pp. 156–159.

6. Kutin A.A., Voronenko V.P. Tekhnologiya upravleniya kachestvom i proizvoditel'nost'yu mekhanosborochnogo proizvodstva [Technological quality management and productivity of field assembly]. Vestnik MGTU «Stankin» – Vestnik MSTU «Stankin», 2010, no. 1, pp. 15–23.

7. Lukina S.V. Avtomatizatsiya protsedur formirovaniya i vybora strukturnykh komponovok sbornykh rezhushchikh instrumentov na etape tekhnicheskoi podgotovki proizvodstva [Autmating procedures for formation and choice of structural component layout of modular cutting tools in step of technical preparation production]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta – Vestnik Saratov State Technical University, 2011, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 241–247.

8. Lukina S.V. Modelirovanie protsedur formirovaniya i vybora strukturnykh komponovok sbornykh rezhushchikh instrumentov na osnove setevykh graf-modelei [Modeling procedures for formation and choice of structural component layout of modular cutting tools using network graph-models]. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) – Metal Working and Material Science, 2009, no. 2, pp. 28–30.

9. Lukina S.V. Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti sbornykh metallorezhushchikh instrumentov na etape ikh proektirovaniya i vybora [Estimation of competitiveness of modular metal-cutting tools at a stage of their designing and a choice]. Sborka v mashinostroenii, priborostroenii – Assembling in mechanical engineering and instrument-making, 2011, no. 9, pp. 3–8.

10. Lukina S.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti proektirovaniya sbornogo rezhushchego instrumenta na baze ustanovlennykh vzaimosvyazei konstruktorsko-tekhnologicheskikh i ekonomicheskikh reshenii. Diss. dokt. tekhn. nauk [Improving the efficiency of the design of the cutting tool on the basis of established relationships design and technological and economic decisions. Dr. eng. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1999. 448 p.

11. Lukina S.V., Krutyakova M.V. Sovremennye problemy organizatsii i upravleniya instrumental'nym obespecheniem mashinostroitel'nykh proizvodstv [Modern problems of organization and management of tool maintenance machine industry]. Moscow, MGTU «MAMI» Publ., 2013. 116 p.

12. Maslov A.R. Konstruirovanie instrumental'noi osnastki [Construction tooling]. Moscow, Yanus-K Publ., 2012. 151 p. ISBN 978-5-8037-0557-4

13. Lukina S.V., Krutyakova M.V, Kupriyanova O.P., Vyalkova P.F. Proektirovanie protyazhek optimal'nykh konstruktsii v srede Microsoft Excel [Optimal design broaching in Microsoft Excel]. Obrabotka metallov (tekhnologiya, oborudovanie, instrumenty) – Metal Working and Material Science, 2010, no. 1 (46), pp. 24–26.

14. Sobolev A.N., Kosov M.G., Nekrasov A.Ya. Modelirovanie konstruktsii korpusnykh detalei s ispol'zovaniem raschetnykh makroelementov [The modeling of constructions of gear housing details using calculating macrocells]. Vestnik MGTU «Stankin» – Vestnik MSTU «Stankin», 2014, no. 3 (30), pp. 98–101.

15. Bernardo M., Casadesus M., Karapetrovic S., Heras I. Relationships between the integration of audits and management systems: an empirical study. The TQM Journal, 2011, vol. 23, iss. 6, pp. 659–672. doi: 10.1108/17542731111175266

16. Mani M., Lyons K., Sriram R. Developing a sustainability manufacturing maturity model. Proceedings from the IMS 2020 Summer School on Sustainable Manufacturing. Zurich, Swiss, 2010, pp. 311–321.

17. Mello C.H.P., Turrioni J.B., Xavier A.F., Campos D.F. Action research in industrial engineering: design organization proposal for its application. Production Journal, 2012, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1590/S0103-65132011005000056

18. Nowicki P., Kafel P., Sikora T. Selected requirements of integrated management systems based on PAS 99 specification. International Journal for Quality Research, 2013, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 97–106.

19. PAS 99:2012. Specification of common management system requirements as a framework for integration. London, BSI, 2012. 35 p.

20. Lima E.P., Costa S.E.G., Angelis J.J. Framing operations and performance strategic management system design process. Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2010, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–46.

21. Sakovic M. Quality management in development of hard coatings on cutting tools. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 2007, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 421–429.

22. Tari J.J., Molina-Azorin J.F. Integration of quality management and environmental management systems: Similarities and the role of the EFQM model. The TQM Journal, 2010, vol. 22, iss. 6, pp. 687–701. doi: 10.1108/17542731011085348

23. Zivkovic S., Takic L., Zivkovic N. The improvement of environmental performances by applying ISO 14001 standard – A case study. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 2013, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 541–552. doi: 10.2298/CICEQ120513088Z
Views: 3373