3. Review Requirements

The reviewer enters the review into the journal database online, filling in the mandatory evaluation fields of the form and adding the review text at their discretion. To be able to enter a review, the reviewer must register on the magazine website. The reviewer evaluates the following qualities of the manuscript:

Compliance of the submitted work with the log profile:

• relevance of the work;
• clear formulation of the research task;
• selection of the study method;
• the degree to which results have been achieved;
• novelty of the obtained results;
• the scientific significance of the results;
• practical value;
• consistency of the findings with the results achieved;
• quality of annotation (author's summary);
• Quality of English translation of the annotation (optional);
• compliance of the list of cited works with the problem under consideration;
• structured work;
• presentation style.

Reviews are provided for review by authors without specifying the names of reviewers. If the author wishes to object to the reviewer, he can send a letter to the editor, which should be transmitted to the reviewer within 2 weeks. The reviewer may, at his discretion, respond to the author personally (in this case, the reviewer assumes full responsibility for the possible consequences of revealing his name), transmit the answer through the editorial board or not answer. In the latter case, the reviewer submits to the editors his written opinion on the appropriateness or impracticality of publishing the article, taking into account the content of the author's letter. The editors have the right not to transmit to the reviewer a letter from the author containing incorrect or offensive expressions. In such cases, the editorial board has the right to independently decide on the final rejection of the manuscript.